.
Feedback

Lowey Issues Statement on Military-Style Weapons

Congresswoman calls for limiting sale of "weapons of war" to general public

The following statement was released by Congresswoman Nita Lowey (D-Westchester/Rockland). She has previously called for the reinstatement of the assault weapons ban and online restrictions of the sale of ammunition and assault weapons.

American consumers rightly expect the quality and capability of consumer products to improve over time. This is true nearly across the board— computers are faster and more powerful than ever, vehicles are safer and more fuel-efficient, televisions have wider screens and crisper pictures, and cell phones also function as cameras, calendars, and multimedia players.

But in the case of firearms, technological innovation (coupled with near unrestricted access) has had a grotesque side effect—making it far easier for any disturbed individual to inflict mass casualties on unarmed civilians.

• In addition to bolt-action hunting rifles with low rates of fire, consumers have near unrestricted access to military-style assault weapons fully-equipped with flash suppressors, flashlight mounts, laser sites, and other combat-ready features.

• In addition to revolvers that hold a mere six rounds, consumers can purchase semi-automatic handguns accommodating high-capacity magazines, allowing a shooter to fire dozens of shots before reloading.

• To fill these weapons of mass destruction, consumers can purchase ammunition designed to maximize damage to soft tissue upon impact.

We cannot go back to a time before these weapons existed, and firearms that are currently legal will never become illegal to possess. But we can limit the types of military-style weapons and accessories that can be legally sold to civilian consumers in the future.

Reinstating the assault weapons ban and prohibiting high-capacity magazines is a start. By taking these products off the civilian market, we stop increasing the number of assault rifles and high-capacity magazines in circulation. This step would also make it impossible for disturbed individuals to openly purchase weaponry most efficient for killing. Just maybe, it would also make it more likely for bright minds in science and engineering to use their talents on research, inventions, and product innovations with more beneficial civilian applications.

The American free market is the most effective means ever created to spur innovation in consumer products. But in the case of firearms, the success of this innovation has had tragic consequences. If we do not restrict civilian access to weapons of war, we will have ourselves to blame when the next massacre occurs.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Rochelle Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Nummy December 20, 2012 at 04:12 am
"We cannot go back to a time before these weapons existed, and firearms that are currently legal will never become illegal to possess. But we can limit the types of military-style weapons and accessories that can be legally sold to civilian consumers in the future.''
Nita Lowey, some times it better to keep your lips sealed. The rush to buy these weapons has gone up 30% after the shooting, now hearing this I bet it will top 50% in a few weeks
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ina Aronow June 11, 2013 at 10:40 pm
It seemed to me the key point of moving the City Yard from the waterfront was to open up theRead More waterfront and turn that run down and obsolete yard into a public park overlooking Long Island Sound. The westside site was the most cost effective place to move the yard. Not ideal, but no real alternative has been proposed. I don't think this has much to do with racism. All races can enjoy more of the waterfront. Any development around it will add to our tax base
Martin Sanchez June 12, 2013 at 08:35 am
Ms. Aronow, The issue is that an alternative has been suggested, Ward Acres, as it is much largerRead More and strategically beneficial for the City of New Rochelle. I don't think the recent public discussions has resulted in unanimity in terms of the waterfront being an entirely public venue for all races to enjoy.